The Bridge by Pamela Frankau (1957)

Review by Kath R:

I chose this novel from the pile because it had a photograph of Pamela Frankau on the back looking very intently at the camera smoking a cigarette and looking very much the professional writer. I immediately regretted my choice when I found out from the flyleaf that  it would be about religion and I thought it might be too earnest and too evangelical for me.

I could not have been more wrong – yes, it is about redemption and search for salvation but it is also about being a writer, about choices and about relationships between men and women, father and daughter, mother and son.

This is the story of David Neilson. At the start of the novel, he is on a bridge being led by a stranger and the reader quickly realises that he is on the brink of death and the afterlife. The novel looks back at some significant events of his life which have lead him to this point. There is an incident when he is a child, one in his twenties, a later one when he is married with a daughter, culminating in a series of events in which he wants the comfort which God would give him. The story moves in time from the present (1957) in which he is called Neilson to  the events referred to above in which he is referred to as David.

The structure of the novel feels modern, although having been written in 1957 it is slightly outside  the scope of the collection. When I was reading it I compared the structure to that of Atonement in which someone looks back at her life and actions and spends her life atoning for a single  act. In this novel the atonement is being sought for an event which happens in David’s life about halfway though the book.

The descriptions of the scenery of the beach and swimming in the sea during childhood holidays are superb, always linked to his emotions. In one paragraph he refers to getting into  difficulties in the water:

‘As he yelled the silver line curled and wall (of sea) broke on top of him. Now he would die, Down, down, down, bursting in the dark. Blind, strangling below tons  of water that roared and roared’ (p22)

The casino in France feels very realistic (p112) as does the tension around David’s recklessness when gambling. The incident following the visit to the casino and which ends the trip to France is shocking to the reader. Pamela Frankau only alludes to the event in one short sentence and the reader is then taken forward 5 years in the next chapter to discover the full horrific effects of the incident. This was a superb device which made me gasp and go back and re-read the passage. Pamela Frankau made me care about David.

The women in the story are all strong, in paid professional work and equals to their husbands. There are few working-class women in the novel, but one of them is key to David’s religious conversion and she is also a whole character. One character particularly fascinated me ; I wanted to hear far more about aunt Rachel, who David says as an aside, ‘I later found out was my mother’ and never refers to the matter again.

There were a couple of negatives for me as a 21st century reader. Linda, David’s wife,  refers to her past sexual relationship with a woman as ‘arrested development. Now I look at it, I can see my bi-sexuality was just that: Failure to grow up’ (p272). Pamela Frankau herself had a 10 year relationship with a woman.  Also I disagreed with  David’s (and Frankau’s)  attitude to  atheism: ‘You never claimed to be an atheist. No intelligent person ever does’ (p272).

In the back flyleaf there is a quote from John Davenport, from the Observer about Pamela Frankau’s A Wreath for the Enemy:

This is a real novel, admirably constructed and succinct, the characters beautifully observed, credible but not conventional’.

 This sentence could apply to The Bridge.  I loved the novel and am so excited to discover a new author.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “The Bridge by Pamela Frankau (1957)

  1. Pingback: Frankau month at the special collection | Reading 1900-1950

  2. Where to start with all these Frankau novels? I don’t know so I’ll write about the review. Succinct, well-written and clear as to the reviewer’s reactions to the novel. It’s everything a review should be (and unfortunately often aren’t). Thank you.

  3. I’ve got one lurking on a shelf waiting to be read but I can’t remember which it is. I know I read her in my teens, though, and enjoyed her then. You certainly make me want to read this one.

  4. We had an excellent reading group last night, looking at Pamela, Julia (her grandmother writing under the name Frank Danby) and her sister Ursula (writing under the name Mary Nicholson). Pamela was most resoundingly enjoyed!

    There was a lot of discussion as to why Pamela is not in print at the moment – I am charged with investigating. Something seems to be up with the Virago website at the moment, as it just bounces you back to their blog, which does have author lists. Some of her novels certainly used to be in print with Virago, but not at the moment.

    Frank Danby was also enjoyed. Her novels sounded thoughtful and well-written, but with a odd tendency to turn to melodrama in the final section, as the plot was rather frantically resolved.

    Mary Nicholson was described as ‘unbelievably bad’!

    Hopefully I will get some more reviews in to post on the blog.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s